| Return to Manual | Maine QBS Program - Form F15 | To Print - Use Print Function |
| Return to Home | EXAMPLE - Interview Score sheet and Questions |
EXAMPLE - Interview Score Sheet and Questions
The following model is provided for your use. You may add, delete or modify questions as appropriate for the specific situation but any changes must be made prior to a copy being distributed to the designers being interviewed.
Prior to the Interviews, the client should determine the "weight" that is to be assigned to each of the items being evaluated with the range being from a high of 10 to a low of 1. This helps assure that all "Interviewers" are basing their evaluation using the same weight. The "weight" should be an indication of the relative importance the client places on each item being rated. Each Interviewer should rate Designers independently. Ratings should be indicated on a 1 to 5 scale with 5 being the highest rating.
Owner: _____Hickory Valley____ Project: ______Fire Station____
Interviewer: _____Mr. Smith______ Design Team: ______Draugh & PLN___
Design teams invited to interview for the listed project should be prepared to speak to the following issues during the course of their interview. Questions can be expanded on as appropriate.
|
Question Category |
Rating |
Weight |
Total |
|||
|
1 |
Grasp of Project Requirements: (Owner may evaluate team's analysis, preparation and level of interest) |
3 |
x |
8 |
= |
24 |
|
2 |
Design Approach/Methodology: (Owner may evaluate team's creativity and problem-solving capabilities) |
5 |
x |
8 |
= |
40 |
|
3 |
Key Personnel and Roles: (Owner may evaluate personal qualifications and professional skills of key individuals.) |
4 |
x |
10 |
= |
40 |
|
4 |
Pertinent Experience, Firm: (Owner may evaluate related projects presented as previous work of the team.) |
4 |
x |
8 |
= |
32 |
|
5 |
Pertinent Experience, Individual: (Owner may evaluate related projects presented as previous work of the key personnel.) |
3 |
x |
7 |
= |
21 |
|
6 |
Consultant/In-House Resources: (Owner may evaluate team's abilities and importance of consultant or in-house support services.) |
3 |
x |
5 |
= |
15 |
|
7 |
Technical Project Management: (Owner may evaluate team's abilities related to technical functions such as project cost controls, construction observation, time schedule, etc.) |
5 |
x |
5 |
= |
25 |
|
8 |
Responsiveness to Owner’s Concerns: (Owner may evaluate team's ability to form successful working relationships and communications with the owner.) |
4 |
x |
10 |
= |
40 |
|
9 |
Method of Compensation: (Owner may evaluate team's method of determining compensation. NOTE: This is method, not amount of compensation.) |
3 |
x |
8 |
= |
24 |
Grand Total ___261__